This suffered various problems of weight, recoil, muzzle blast and rapid barrel heating, but then WW1 started so the. 303 with a much more powerful round in the interests of effective long-range shooting (the British had been outranged in the Boer War). ![]() 276 Enfield of around 1910, which was meant to replace the. The British Army is watching what the US is doing, but without any commitment to follow suit (so far). Other NATO nations have considerable reservations about this rifle/ammunition combination because of its weight and recoil. To achieve this, the ammunition needs to be significantly more powerful than the current 7.62 mm NATO (which is already twice as powerful as the 5.56 mm). The Army has developed a 6.8 mm bullet and all contenders are required to use that bullet, and to fire it at a high enough velocity to penetrate military body armour at normal battle ranges. They have been holding a competition to select the Next Generation Squad Weapon (to be precise, two weapons: a rifle, and an automatic rifle). ![]() ![]() However, it appears that the USA is planning the exact opposite. A standard general-purpose infantry rifle firing a general-purpose cartridge (reasonably good in all circumstances rather than great at some things and rubbish at others) would be well worth having IMO.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |